FCA SDR 2026: What UK Financial Services Boards Must Do Now

The FCA’s Sustainability Disclosure Requirements (SDR) regime is now in active enforcement. Under PS23/16, entity-level disclosure requirements apply to asset managers with AuM above £50bn from December 2025, with all remaining in-scope firms required to comply from 2 December 2026. For UK financial services boards, the window for preparation has closed — the window for compliance is open.

SDR is not simply a reporting obligation. It represents the FCA’s most significant structural intervention in sustainable finance labelling and entity-level sustainability governance to date. Boards that treat SDR as a disclosure exercise rather than a governance transformation risk both regulatory sanction and the reputational exposure of an FCA anti-greenwashing enforcement action — a risk that now carries fines, public censure, and potential director accountability under the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SM&CR).

What Does the FCA’s SDR Regime Actually Require From UK Boards?

SDR comprises four interconnected obligations for in-scope UK asset managers and, from future extension, other financial services firms. First, the anti-greenwashing rule — already in force since May 2024 — requires all FCA-regulated firms to ensure that any sustainability claims made about their products or services are fair, clear, and not misleading. This rule applies universally: every FCA-regulated firm, regardless of size or AuM, must comply.

Second, sustainable investment product labels — Sustainability Focus, Sustainability Improvers, Sustainability Impact, and Sustainability Mixed Goals — require asset managers to meet objective portfolio criteria and disclose how the portfolio meets those criteria. Third, consumer-facing sustainability disclosures must accompany any labelled product, with pre-contractual, ongoing, and annual reporting requirements. Fourth, entity-level disclosures — the board’s primary ownership obligation — require firms to publish an annual Sustainability Entity Report describing how sustainability risks and opportunities are integrated into the firm’s strategy, governance, and risk management.

According to the FCA’s Good and Poor Practice review published in 2026, the most common deficiency identified was insufficient board-level challenge and approval of sustainability claims — regulators expect to see evidence of active board scrutiny, not passive sign-off of disclosures prepared by the sustainability team.

Executive Action:

• Confirm at board level whether your firm is in-scope for entity-level SDR disclosures under the December 2025 (£50bn+ AuM) or December 2026 threshold, and assign a named board-level owner for SDR compliance.
• Review every sustainability claim currently made in marketing materials, fund factsheets, annual reports, and client communications against the FCA’s anti-greenwashing rule — this applies now, regardless of SDR entity-level timeline.
• Add SDR compliance status as a standing agenda item at the Risk Committee and at least one full board meeting per quarter until entity-level compliance is confirmed. Use our AI governance self-assessment framework as a structuring model for your SDR readiness review.

How Does SDR Interact With the UK’s Broader Sustainability Reporting Landscape?

SDR sits at the intersection of three parallel UK sustainability reporting frameworks. The UK Sustainability Reporting Standards (UK SRS), expected to be formally adopted in 2025 and effective for financial year 2026 reporting, are based on ISSB S1 and S2 and will apply to listed companies and large private companies. Financial services firms will therefore face both SDR entity-level obligations and UK SRS IFRS-aligned climate and sustainability disclosures simultaneously.

The FCA’s own TCFD-aligned disclosure requirements for premium listed companies and large asset managers have been in force since 2021–2023. SDR entity-level disclosures are additive to, not a replacement for, TCFD reporting. Boards must therefore maintain two distinct sustainability disclosure frameworks running in parallel, with different cadences, metrics, and audience requirements.

The third overlay is the UK Corporate Governance Code’s revised Provision 29 requirements — already in force for financial year 2025 reporting — which require boards to confirm the adequacy of material internal controls, including controls over sustainability data used in disclosures. Where SDR entity-level disclosures rely on internally generated sustainability metrics, those metrics are now in scope for the Audit Committee’s internal controls assurance work.

According to Travers Smith analysis published in 2026, the interaction between SDR, UK SRS, and TCFD creates a disclosure architecture of significant complexity for dual-regulated firms. Asset managers who are also listed companies face the full stack simultaneously, requiring close coordination between the CFO, sustainability function, General Counsel, and board.

Executive Action:

• Map your firm’s complete sustainability disclosure obligations — TCFD, UK SRS, SDR entity-level, and Provision 29 internal controls — onto a single compliance timeline, identifying where data sources, assurance processes, and board approvals can be consolidated.
• Ensure the Audit Committee formally scopes the sustainability data controls review under Provision 29 to include the metrics supporting your SDR entity-level disclosures — this closes a gap that the FCA’s Good Practice review found in a significant proportion of in-scope firms.
• Brief the Remuneration Committee on whether SDR compliance metrics should be incorporated into executive performance frameworks, as the FCA increasingly expects sustainability governance to be reflected in remuneration design at the most senior levels.

What Are the SM&CR Implications of SDR for Senior Managers?

SDR creates material personal accountability exposure under the Senior Managers and Certification Regime for named individuals whose statements of responsibilities include oversight of sustainability risk, disclosures, or product governance. Where an SDR entity-level disclosure or product label is found to be misleading — or where the board cannot evidence active challenge and approval — the FCA can investigate whether named senior managers exercised their functions with due skill, care, and diligence under FSMA 2000.

This risk is not theoretical. The FCA’s 2026 enforcement priorities include targeted SDR anti-greenwashing actions, and the regulator has signalled willingness to use SM&CR accountability alongside financial penalties in cases of systematic disclosure failure. For Non-Executive Directors chairing the Risk or Audit Committee, the governance accountability line for SDR is direct: board challenge of sustainability claims is an SM&CR expectation, not just a governance best practice.

Firms should review Senior Manager Responsibilities Maps to ensure SDR ownership is clearly allocated — typically split between the CEO (entity-level strategy), CFO (financial and metric integrity), and a named Chief Sustainability Officer or equivalent. Where no such role exists, the gap in accountability is itself an FCA supervisory concern. Visit our executive briefing library for detailed SM&CR accountability frameworks.

Executive Action:

• Review every Senior Manager’s Statement of Responsibilities to confirm SDR obligations are explicitly allocated and that no accountability gap exists between sustainability disclosures and named SM&CR ownership.
• Commission a legal review of all sustainability claims in external communications for compliance with the FCA’s anti-greenwashing rule — this should be completed before the December 2026 entity-level deadline, not concurrent with it.
• Ensure board minutes capture the nature of sustainability disclosure challenges raised by NEDs — this contemporaneous record is the primary evidence the FCA will request in any supervisory review of SDR governance.

What Should UK Financial Services Boards Prioritise in H2 2026?

The December 2026 entity-level SDR deadline for smaller in-scope firms is six months away. For boards not yet compliant with entity-level obligations, the H2 2026 action sequence is non-negotiable: assess scope, appoint accountability, audit sustainability claims, build the Sustainability Entity Report, and confirm board approval before December.

For boards already in compliance with entity-level obligations — those above the £50bn AuM threshold who were required to comply by December 2025 — H2 2026 is the first annual cycle review. The FCA’s expectation is that the first entity-level Sustainability Entity Report is not a compliance baseline, but a genuine reflection of how sustainability is integrated into firm strategy and governance. Firms that have filed a technically compliant but strategically thin report should use H2 2026 to strengthen the narrative ahead of FCA supervisory engagement.

The broader strategic opportunity is the convergence of SDR, UK SRS, and TCFD into a unified sustainability intelligence function — one that generates high-quality, board-reviewed sustainability data that can serve regulatory disclosure, investor relations, and strategic planning simultaneously. Boards that invest in this infrastructure now will be ahead of the next regulatory cycle. Explore our technology strategy review template for a governance framework applicable to sustainability data infrastructure.

Executive Action:

• Set a December 2026 SDR compliance milestone with a named senior manager owner, quarterly board reporting against milestones, and external legal or audit review of the Sustainability Entity Report draft before publication.
• Initiate a data infrastructure review to identify gaps in sustainability metric collection, assurance, and reporting systems — the FCA expects metrics to be accurate, consistent, and subject to appropriate internal review.
• Brief investors and institutional shareholders proactively on your SDR compliance status and entity-level reporting timeline — sophisticated investors are monitoring FCA SDR compliance as a governance quality indicator.

INFORMD provides intelligence briefings, tools and frameworks for senior business leaders across technology, finance, strategy and compliance. Based in Milton Keynes, UK, we help executives stay informed and act with confidence. Explore our full briefing library or access our free assessment tools.

Stay ahead. Subscribe to INFORMD’s weekly executive briefing at informd.co.uk.